Wikipedia vaten:Varyantê Zazaki/Fonetikê çekuyanê ğeriban

Some words are here is nor supposed to be in Standard Zazaki

Words like "genc", "suke", "ixtiyar" are not supposed to be in standard Zazaki. I don't think that they should be in this page either. I understand that words like kewçıke, proje should be there, but not the ones that are not in the standard. Xosere 18:17, 25 Temuze 2008 (UTC)

So, I erased genc, ixtiyar, and sûke entries. Xosere 18:20, 25 Temuze 2008 (UTC)

Ok. --Dersimıc 18:46, 25 Temuze 2008 (UTC)

-ci Suffix is not Zazaki

I see here words like "matematikçi" and "bostanci" here in the texts. I don't can imagine how people as Asmen they founded a Zazaki-Institute can support such turkisms? The alternative to "ci" is in Zazaki "kar", as in:

Turkish : Zazaki
demirci : asınkar
işci : karkar
yalancı : zürkar

Yes, "kar" had for tousand years maybe another meaning, but the todays meaning is the same as turkish "ci". So this words were in right Zazaki suchwise:

Turkish : Zazaki
Matematikçi : Matematikkar
Bostancı : Bostankar

--AliErsoy 21:31, 7 Çele 2009 (UTC)

Where there is a word like matematikçi? But all other job titles here described with -ci, are the original texts of Mr. Koyo Berz. So it’s true that the suffix -ci is borrowed from Turkish. So what! On the other hand we have many other endings in Zazaki than the suffix -kar, like -ber, -ban/-van/-wan, -dar, -ker etc. So the suffix -kar doesn’t always work for all words. Thus some of your examples are wrong, e. g. the right forms are: karker (not karkar), züreker (not zürkar), bostanwan (not bostankar) a.s.o.

Bıra Ali what are you actually trying to achieve? You say always to us, our options would be right and in public you attack us every time from the rear. What kind of attitude is this? Please be somewhat stable and not so fragile.

But you disregard probably the errors of your dude Xosere, or what? Please, have a look at this article for example and tell us what everything is written wrong, after changing of this article by Xosere. There are several such articles, these our oh-so-correct Lord Xosere tries to adjust to the alleged DIQ standards. He doesn’t even note his own fault, because he is not powerful in any of the Zazaki dialects.

Please, don’t waste our time with such unnecessary actions any more. If you want to learn, research, before you set any theoretical opposites. --Mirzali 23:10, 7 Çele 2009 (UTC)